Latest tribunal outcome relating to employment status

28 July 2021

A recent employment tribunal case looked at whether a worker would be classified as self-employed or as a ‘worker’, as the individual asserted that she should have been paid the National Minimum Wage (NMW) due to being a ‘worker’.

The tribunal found that she was not deemed a ‘worker’, due to a variety of reasons.

First, the individual was able to send a substitution to carry out work in her place and exercised this right on several instances. She did this without prior approval from the engager. Secondly, she took extended periods of time off work to visit relatives in Colombia and was not paid for the time she spent away. Additionally, she did not seek approval from the engager for her absences but simply notified when she was going to be away and sourced appropriate cover for the period of absence. 

The individual also managed her own daily cleaning duties and was only supervised for a short period in the first couple of weeks. She was not subject to performance reviews or disciplinary procedures.

For all of the reasons listed above, the tribunal concluded that she was not a ‘worker’ and subsequently, not eligible for the NMW. 
 


Information provided in this news article may be subject to change. Please make note of the date of publication to ensure that you are viewing up to date information. Download the CIPP's Payroll: Need to know - your guide to payroll legislation and reporting for the most up to date data.