The Supreme Court rules that sleep-in care workers are not entitled to the minimum wage
19 March 2021
In a landmark case, held on 19 March 2021, the Supreme Court ruled that care workers who fulfil ‘sleep-in’ shifts are not entitled to be paid the National Minimum Wage (NMW) for any hours that they are not awake and not actually performing a specific activity.
The latest ruling puts an end to a legal battle that has spanned four years and related to two care workers employed by the charity, Mencap. One of the claimants in question was Mrs. Tomlinson-Blake, who was a support worker for adults that were classed as being vulnerable. Her job involved carrying out ‘sleep-in’ shifts between the hours of 10pm – 7 am. The other claimant was Mr. Shannon, a carer, who, as part of his role, had to stay overnight at a residential care home based in Surrey.
Cases held back in 2018, which were both dismissed by the Employment Tribunal and Court of Appeal, saw Mrs. Tomlinson-Blake assert that her flat-rate pay, plus an hour’s pay, for ‘sleep-in shifts’ should instead be paid at standard NMW rates. Mr. Shannon also fought for an hourly pay rate as opposed to a flat rate of pay for the duration of time in which he was required to complete ‘sleep-in’ shifts.
The stance taken by the Supreme Court is that care workers are only eligible for the NMW hourly rate on ‘sleep-in’ shifts, for any time that they are actually awake for the purposes of working.
One of the implications of the judgement is that neither Mrs. Tomlinson-Blake or Mr. Shannon are able to submit claims for any backdated pay. If the outcome of the case had been different, and payment of the NMW would have been made mandatory for all hours spent on ‘sleep-in’ shifts, then this could have resulted in impacted employers having to pay out more than £400 million in back-dated wages.
Information provided in this news article may be subject to change. Please make note of the date of publication to ensure that you are viewing up to date information.